On Thursday 02 November 2006 01:27, Andrew Morton wrote:~~~~~~~~~~~~On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:11:55 -0800Until the tools get fixed, how about applying this patch ?
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Starting labels in column 2 gives me the creeps, personally. But there's aHmm, I guess that should be defined once and for all inI have some other CodingStyle changes to submit, but feel free
Documentation/CodingStyle
to write this one up.
decent justification for it.
However, I didn't know that we had a known style for this, otherThe problem is that `diff -p' screws up and displays the label: in the
than "not indented so far that it's hidden".
If a label in column 0 [0-based :] confuses patch, then that's
a reason, I suppose. I wasn't aware of that one...
In a case like that, we usually say "fix the tool then."
place where it should be displaying the function name.
Of course, lots of people forget the -p anyway... Maybe we can fix those
tools ;)
Add CodngStyle info on labels.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/Documentation/CodingStyle b/Documentation/CodingStyle
index 29c1896..f8a3abb 100644
--- a/Documentation/CodingStyle
+++ b/Documentation/CodingStyle
@@ -566,6 +566,18 @@ result. Typical examples would be funct
NULL or the ERR_PTR mechanism to report failure.
+ Chapter 17: Labels
+
+Label names should be lowercase.
+
+Label names should start with a letter [a-z].
+
+Labels should not be placed at column 0. Doing so confuses some tools, most
+notably 'diff' and 'patch'. Instead place labels at column 1 (indented 1
+space). In some cases it's OK to indent labels one or more tabs, but
+generally it is prefered that labels be placed at column 1.