Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices

[Chris Friesen]

Paul Menage wrote:

> The framework should be flexible enough to let controllers register
> any control parameters (via the filesystem?) that they need, but it
> shouldn't contain explicit concepts like guarantees and limits.

If the framework was able to handle arbitrary control parameters, that 
would certainly be interesting.

Presumably there would be some way for the controllers to be called from 
the framework to validate those parameters?

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/