Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices

[David Rientjes]

On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Pavel Emelianov wrote:

> So if we're going to have different groupings for different
> resources what's the use of "container" grouping all "controllers"
> together? I see this situation like each task_struct carries
> pointers to kmemsize controller, pivate pages controller,
> physical pages controller, CPU time controller, disk bandwidth
> controller, etc. Right? Or did I miss something?

My understanding is that the only addition to the task_struct is a pointer 
to the struct container it belongs to.  Then, the various controllers can 
register the control files through the fs-based container interface and 
all the manipulation can be done at that level.  Having each task_struct 
containing pointers to individual resource nodes was never proposed.

		David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/