Re: [PATCH 1/2] sunrpc: add missing spin_unlock

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Sun Nov 05 2006 - 14:53:25 EST


On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 17:35:16 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 22:37 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> > auth_domain_put() forgot to unlock acquired spinlock.
> >
> > Cc: Olaf Kirch <okir@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I just found this too while trying to get .19-rc4-git up and running on
> a machine here - took me a few hours.
>
> It made my kernel decidedly unhappy :-(
>
> Andrew, could you push this and:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/3/109
> into .19 still? - those patches are needed to make todays git happy on
> my machine.

OK.

> > Index: work-fault-inject/net/sunrpc/svcauth.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- work-fault-inject.orig/net/sunrpc/svcauth.c
> > +++ work-fault-inject/net/sunrpc/svcauth.c
> > @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ void auth_domain_put(struct auth_domain
> > if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&dom->ref.refcount, &auth_domain_lock)) {
> > hlist_del(&dom->hash);
> > dom->flavour->domain_release(dom);
> > + spin_unlock(&auth_domain_lock);
> > }
> > }

I wonder if this will fix http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7457
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/