Re: Poor NFSv4 first impressions

[Bill Davidsen]

Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Being a big user of NFS at home, and a big fan of NFSv4, it was high
> > time that I converted my home network from NFSv3 to NFSv4.
> >
> > Unfortunately applications started breaking left and right.  vim
> > noticeably malfunctioned, trying repeatedly to create a swapfile (sorta
> > like a lockfile).  Mozilla Thunderbird would crash reproducibly whenever
> > it tried anything remotely major with a mailbox, such as compressing
> > folders (removing deleted messages).
> [snip]
>
> This has all the symptoms to an open EACCES NFSv4 bug in 2.6.18/19.
> This is fixed in:
>
> http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/kernel-patches/2.6.19-rc3-2/linux-2.6.19-rc3-CITI_NFS4_ALL-2.diff 
>
> (see http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/).
>
> With this patch, I can run just great with NFSv4 home dir (etc)
> mounts; without, I get the symptom of many 0-byte temporary/lock files
> being created and often the inability to create files (!). Be sure to
> allow callback delegation connections in through your firewall for the
> extra performance ;-) .
>
> Maybe it's too late for these fixes 2.6.19, but they should certainly
> make 2.6.19.1 IMHO.

If NFSv4 really works that poorly without the patches, perhaps they 
should go in 2.6.19 at the start. I'm surprised others aren't having 
this problem, I thought there was more test use.


--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  Obscure bug of 2004: BASH BUFFER OVERFLOW - if bash is being run by a
normal user and is setuid root, with the "vi" line edit mode selected,
and the character set is "big5," an off-by-one errors occurs during
wildcard (glob) expansion.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/