[PATCH][v2] Handle per-subsystem mutexes for CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU not set.
From: Gautham R Shenoy
Date: Fri Nov 24 2006 - 07:38:32 EST
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 09:57:02AM +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> > But what to do about the now-unneeded mutex?
> >
> > We can just leave it there if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n but then we'll get
> > unused variable warnings for statically-defined mutexes.
>
> Why even leave it there?
>
> Can't we do something as follows, which has already been suggested in
> the patch description:
>
> Each hotcpu aware subsystem defines the hotcpu_mutex as follows
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> [static] DEFINE_MUTEX(my_hotcpu_mutex);
> #endif
>
> That way, we won't be having any unneeded mutexes at all.
I take back these words. In addition to the fact that this would
introduce more #ifdef noise in .c files, this approach won't work
in cases where we will be reusing existing mutexes as hotcpu_mutexes.
Eg: workqueue_mutex in kernel/workqueue.c and cache_chain_mutex in
mm/slab.c
> > or
> >
> > #define cpuhotplug_mutex_lock(m) do { (void)(m); } while (0)
> >
> >
> > Given that the former won't work, I'd suggest the latter ;)
The patch below implements the latter :)
This patch provides a common interface for all the subsystems to
lock and unlock their per-subsystem hotcpu mutexes.
When CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is not set, these operations would be no-ops.
Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/cpu.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
Index: hotplug/include/linux/cpu.h
===================================================================
--- hotplug.orig/include/linux/cpu.h
+++ hotplug/include/linux/cpu.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <asm/semaphore.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
struct cpu {
int node_id; /* The node which contains the CPU */
@@ -74,6 +75,17 @@ extern struct sysdev_class cpu_sysdev_cl
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
/* Stop CPUs going up and down. */
+
+static inline void cpuhotplug_mutex_lock(struct mutex *cpu_hp_mutex)
+{
+ mutex_lock(cpu_hp_mutex);
+}
+
+static inline void cpuhotplug_mutex_unlock(struct mutex *cpu_hp_mutex)
+{
+ mutex_unlock(cpu_hp_mutex);
+}
+
extern void lock_cpu_hotplug(void);
extern void unlock_cpu_hotplug(void);
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) { \
@@ -86,6 +98,9 @@ extern void unlock_cpu_hotplug(void);
int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu);
#define cpu_is_offline(cpu) unlikely(!cpu_online(cpu))
#else
+#define cpuhotplug_mutex_lock(m) do { (void)(m); } while (0)
+#define cpuhotplug_mutex_unlock(m) do { (void)(m); } while (0)
+
#define lock_cpu_hotplug() do { } while (0)
#define unlock_cpu_hotplug() do { } while (0)
#define lock_cpu_hotplug_interruptible() 0
--
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/