Re: [patch] cpufreq: mark cpufreq_tsc() as core_initcall_sync

[Oleg Nesterov]

Ok, synchronize_xxx() passed 1 hour rcutorture test on dual P-III.

It behaves the same as srcu but optimized for writers. The fast path
for synchronize_xxx() is mutex_lock() + atomic_read() + mutex_unlock().
The slow path is __wait_event(), no polling. However, the reader does
atomic inc/dec on lock/unlock, and the counters are not per-cpu.

Jens, is it ok for you? Alan, Paul, what is your opinion?

Oleg.

--- 19-rc6/kernel/__rcutorture.c	2006-11-17 19:42:31.000000000 +0300
+++ 19-rc6/kernel/rcutorture.c	2006-11-24 21:00:00.000000000 +0300
@@ -464,6 +464,120 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops srcu_ops =
 	.name = "srcu"
 };
 
+//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+struct xxx_struct {
+	int completed;
+	atomic_t ctr[2];
+	struct mutex mutex;
+	wait_queue_head_t wq;
+};
+
+void init_xxx_struct(struct xxx_struct *sp)
+{
+	sp->completed = 0;
+	atomic_set(sp->ctr + 0, 1);
+	atomic_set(sp->ctr + 1, 0);
+	mutex_init(&sp->mutex);
+	init_waitqueue_head(&sp->wq);
+}
+
+int xxx_read_lock(struct xxx_struct *sp)
+{
+	for (;;) {
+		int idx = sp->completed & 0x1;
+		if (likely(atomic_inc_not_zero(sp->ctr + idx)))
+			return idx;
+	}
+}
+
+void xxx_read_unlock(struct xxx_struct *sp, int idx)
+{
+	if (unlikely(atomic_dec_and_test(sp->ctr + idx)))
+		wake_up(&sp->wq);
+}
+
+void synchronize_xxx(struct xxx_struct *sp)
+{
+	int idx;
+
+	mutex_lock(&sp->mutex);
+
+	idx = sp->completed & 0x1;
+	if (!atomic_add_unless(sp->ctr + idx, -1, 1))
+		goto out;
+
+	atomic_inc(sp->ctr + (idx ^ 0x1));
+	sp->completed++;
+
+	__wait_event(sp->wq, !atomic_read(sp->ctr + idx));
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&sp->mutex);
+}
+
+//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+static struct xxx_struct xxx_ctl;
+
+static void xxx_torture_init(void)
+{
+	init_xxx_struct(&xxx_ctl);
+	rcu_sync_torture_init();
+}
+
+static void xxx_torture_cleanup(void)
+{
+	synchronize_xxx(&xxx_ctl);
+}
+
+static int xxx_torture_read_lock(void)
+{
+	return xxx_read_lock(&xxx_ctl);
+}
+
+static void xxx_torture_read_unlock(int idx)
+{
+	xxx_read_unlock(&xxx_ctl, idx);
+}
+
+static int xxx_torture_completed(void)
+{
+	return xxx_ctl.completed;
+}
+
+static void xxx_torture_synchronize(void)
+{
+	synchronize_xxx(&xxx_ctl);
+}
+
+static int xxx_torture_stats(char *page)
+{
+	int cnt = 0;
+	int idx = xxx_ctl.completed & 0x1;
+
+	cnt += sprintf(&page[cnt], "%s%s per-CPU(idx=%d):",
+			torture_type, TORTURE_FLAG, idx);
+
+	cnt += sprintf(&page[cnt], " (%d,%d)",
+			atomic_read(xxx_ctl.ctr + 0),
+			atomic_read(xxx_ctl.ctr + 1));
+
+	cnt += sprintf(&page[cnt], "\n");
+	return cnt;
+}
+
+static struct rcu_torture_ops xxx_ops = {
+	.init = xxx_torture_init,
+	.cleanup = xxx_torture_cleanup,
+	.readlock = xxx_torture_read_lock,
+	.readdelay = srcu_read_delay,
+	.readunlock = xxx_torture_read_unlock,
+	.completed = xxx_torture_completed,
+	.deferredfree = rcu_sync_torture_deferred_free,
+	.sync = xxx_torture_synchronize,
+	.stats = xxx_torture_stats,
+	.name = "xxx"
+};
+//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
 /*
  * Definitions for sched torture testing.
  */
@@ -503,8 +617,8 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops sched_ops 
 };
 
 static struct rcu_torture_ops *torture_ops[] =
-	{ &rcu_ops, &rcu_sync_ops, &rcu_bh_ops, &rcu_bh_sync_ops, &srcu_ops,
-	  &sched_ops, NULL };
+	{ &rcu_ops, &rcu_sync_ops, &rcu_bh_ops, &rcu_bh_sync_ops,
+	  &srcu_ops, &xxx_ops, &sched_ops, NULL };
 
 /*
  * RCU torture writer kthread.  Repeatedly substitutes a new structure

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/