Re: [patch] x86: unify/rewrite SMP TSC sync code

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 18:56 -0800, Wink Saville wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > a new CPU is added. If the TSC isnt sync on SMP then it quickly gets 
> > pretty messy, and we should rather take a look at /why/ these apps are 
> > using RDTSC.
> > 
> > 	Ingo
> > -
> 
> I use RDTSC in get a cheap method of measuring time. What other choices are
> there for a low overhead high frequency time source?
> 
> By low overhead a kernel call is way to expensive, I want to minimally impact
> the code and have many of these calls through out the code. One of the
> ways I use it is to instrument multi-threaded applications and then use
> the TSC to compare when actions occur between threads. i.e. I use it as a
> time stamp counter and neither precision or accuracy is too important.
> On the other hand the more precise and accurate the better:)

so you can live with an occasional jump of seconds/minutes between
threads? Or when a thread moves to another cpu?
(yes on many PCs you won't see minutes, but on others you will)

-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/