Re: [PATCH-2.4] jfs: incorrect use of "&&" instead of "&"
From: Dave Kleikamp
Date: Sat Nov 25 2006 - 15:44:06 EST
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 22:24 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I'm about to merge this fix in 2.4. It's already in 2.6 BTW.
> Do you have any objection ?
No objection.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Willy
>
> From b14cb91c6621908f8e957aad5a85d6c41b31dfea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:57:26 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] jfs: incorrect use of "&&" instead of "&"
>
> in jfs_txnmgr, the use of "tblk->flag && COMMIT_DELETE" in a
> if() condition is obviously wrong. This bug has already been
> fixed in 2.6.
>
> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c
> index 62e6493..4e6a280 100644
> --- a/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c
> +++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c
> @@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ int txCommit(tid_t tid, /* transaction
> jfs_ip = JFS_IP(ip);
>
> if (test_and_clear_cflag(COMMIT_Syncdata, ip) &&
> - ((tblk->flag && COMMIT_DELETE) == 0))
> + ((tblk->flag & COMMIT_DELETE) == 0))
> fsync_inode_data_buffers(ip);
>
> /*
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/