Re: Adaptive readahead V16 benchmarks

[Nate Diller]

On 11/24/06, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Here are some benchmarks for the latest adaptive readahead patchset.
>
> Most benchmarks have 3+ runs and have the numbers averaged.
> However some testing times are short and not quite stable.
>
> Most of them are carried out on my PC:
>         Seagate ST3250820A 250G/8M IDE disk, 512M Memory, AMD Sempron 2200+
>
> Basic conclusions:
> - equivalent performance in normal cases
> - much better in: busy NFS server; sparse/backward reading
> - adapts to memory size very well on randomly loading a file

These results look really good, and the code seems to be at least as
well-structured as the previous code.  I think this argues for
inclusion.

NATE
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/