Re: Problem with 2.6.18: memory leak(?)

[Alexander V. Lukyanov]

On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 07:38:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It's not necessarily a leak.  Networking tried to allocate two

You are right, it is not a leak. Probably the memory usage increased for some
other reason.

> physically-contiguous pages from atomic context, but no such two pages were
> available.  The packet will be dropped and things should recover.
> 
> Increasing /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes will reduce the frequency somewhat.
> If it's actually a problem, which I doubt?

It is a problem. The messages load syslog and thus disk, network performance
decreases due to lost packets. I'll try to increase min_free_kbytes and
see if it helps.

-- 
   Alexander.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/