[DLM] fix format warnings in rcom.c and recoverd.c [66/70]

[Steven Whitehouse]

>From 57adf7eede38d315e0e328c52484d6a596e9a238 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryusuke Konishi <ryusuke@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:33:48 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [DLM] fix format warnings in rcom.c and recoverd.c

This fixes the following gcc warnings generated on
the architectures where uint64_t != unsigned long long (e.g. ppc64).

fs/dlm/rcom.c:154: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
fs/dlm/rcom.c:154: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'uint64_t'
fs/dlm/recoverd.c:48: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'uint64_t'
fs/dlm/recoverd.c:202: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'uint64_t'
fs/dlm/recoverd.c:210: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'uint64_t'

Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <ryusuke@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/dlm/rcom.c     |    3 ++-
 fs/dlm/recoverd.c |    8 +++++---
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/rcom.c b/fs/dlm/rcom.c
index c42f2db..4cc31be 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/rcom.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/rcom.c
@@ -172,7 +172,8 @@ static void receive_sync_reply(struct dl
 	    rc_in->rc_id != ls->ls_rcom_seq) {
 		log_debug(ls, "reject reply %d from %d seq %llx expect %llx",
 			  rc_in->rc_type, rc_in->rc_header.h_nodeid,
-			  rc_in->rc_id, ls->ls_rcom_seq);
+			  (unsigned long long)rc_in->rc_id,
+			  (unsigned long long)ls->ls_rcom_seq);
 		goto out;
 	}
 	memcpy(ls->ls_recover_buf, rc_in, rc_in->rc_header.h_length);
diff --git a/fs/dlm/recoverd.c b/fs/dlm/recoverd.c
index 9dc2f91..650536a 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/recoverd.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/recoverd.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static int ls_recover(struct dlm_ls *ls,
 	unsigned long start;
 	int error, neg = 0;
 
-	log_debug(ls, "recover %llx", rv->seq);
+	log_debug(ls, "recover %llx", (unsigned long long)rv->seq);
 
 	mutex_lock(&ls->ls_recoverd_active);
 
@@ -212,7 +212,8 @@ static int ls_recover(struct dlm_ls *ls,
 
 	dlm_astd_wake();
 
-	log_debug(ls, "recover %llx done: %u ms", rv->seq,
+	log_debug(ls, "recover %llx done: %u ms",
+		  (unsigned long long)rv->seq,
 		  jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - start));
 	mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_recoverd_active);
 
@@ -220,7 +221,8 @@ static int ls_recover(struct dlm_ls *ls,
 
  fail:
 	dlm_release_root_list(ls);
-	log_debug(ls, "recover %llx error %d", rv->seq, error);
+	log_debug(ls, "recover %llx error %d",
+		  (unsigned long long)rv->seq, error);
 	mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_recoverd_active);
 	return error;
 }
-- 
1.4.1



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/