Re: What happened to CONFIG_TCP_NAGLE_OFF?

[Herbert Xu]

Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> UDP is highly appropriate because the congestion controls and other 
> features of TCP are not required for this type of data, and in fact, 
> tend to muck things up.  That is why the application needs to implement 
> its own congestion, sequencing, retransmit and connect/disconnect 
> controls; because the way TCP handles them is not good for this 
> application.

Congestion control is always appropriate in a shared network.  Please
note that congestion control does not conflict with the objectives of
UDP.  For UDP, congestion control can simply mean dropping packets at
the source.  DCCP is a good replacement for UDP that has congestion
control.

In general it's much better to much better to drop packets at the
source rather than half-way through.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/