Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an archdoesn't support it

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Russell King wrote:

> I'm trying to suggest a better implementation for atomic ops rather
> than just bowing to this x86-centric "cmpxchg is the best, everyone
> must implement it" mentality.

cmpxchg is the simplest solution to realize many other atomic operations 
and its widely available on a wide variety of platforms. It is the most 
universal atomic instruction that I know of. Other atomic operations may 
be more efficient but certainly cmpxchg is the most universal.

Having multiple instructions with restrictions of what can be done in 
between just complicates the use and seems to be arch specific. I have not 
seen a better solution. Are you really advocating the weirdly complex 
ll/sc be adopted by other architectures?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/