Re: [PATCH] 2.6 driver for Silan SC92031 (second try)

From: Cesar Eduardo Barros
Date: Sat Dec 09 2006 - 15:29:09 EST


Andrew Morton escreveu:
> On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 18:17:06 -0200
> Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> + } while(unlikely(cmpxchg(&priv->intr_status,
>
> You'll have the arm maintainer after you with a pointy stick.
>
> cmpxchg is only available on certain architectures. It would be acceptable
> to make this driver depend on X86 (or something). Better to rewrite this
> code so it doesn't use cmpxchg.

Fixed. As long as I make sure the interrupt and the tasklet never run at the
same time, I do not need to protect intr_status against concurrent modification.

Also fixed a potential bug where the tasklet could end up permanently disabled.

Apply on top of the previous (2.0b) patch (if you prefer a merged patch, just
ask and I'll make one).

It has received the same testing as the previous one, only for less time (I'm
using it right now).

Signed-off-by: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@xxxxxxxxxx>

---

diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.19.orig/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.19-2.0b/drivers/net/sc92031.c linux-2.6.19/drivers/net/sc92031.c
--- linux-2.6.19-2.0b/drivers/net/sc92031.c 2006-12-09 17:53:22.000000000 -0200
+++ linux-2.6.19/drivers/net/sc92031.c 2006-12-09 17:55:20.000000000 -0200
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@

#define SC92031_NAME "sc92031"
#define SC92031_DESCRIPTION "Silan SC92031 PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter driver"
-#define SC92031_VERSION "2.0b"
+#define SC92031_VERSION "2.0c"

/* BAR 0 is MMIO, BAR 1 is PIO */
#ifndef SC92031_USE_BAR
@@ -261,6 +261,12 @@ enum PMConfigBits {
* Use mmiowb() before unlocking if the hardware was written to.
*/

+/* Locking rules for the interrupt:
+ * - the interrupt and the tasklet never run at the same time
+ * - neither run between sc92031_disable_interrupts and
+ * sc92031_enable_interrupt
+ */
+
struct sc92031_priv {
spinlock_t lock;
/* iomap.h cookie */
@@ -288,6 +294,7 @@ struct sc92031_priv {

/* copies of some hardware registers */
u32 intr_status;
+ atomic_t intr_mask;
u32 rx_config;
u32 tx_config;
u32 pm_config;
@@ -304,6 +311,13 @@ struct sc92031_priv {
struct net_device_stats stats;
};

+/* I don't know which registers can be safely read; however, I can guess
+ * MAC0 is one of them. */
+static inline void _sc92031_dummy_read(void __iomem *port_base)
+{
+ ioread32(port_base + MAC0);
+}
+
static u32 _sc92031_mii_wait(void __iomem *port_base)
{
u32 mii_status;
@@ -348,12 +362,18 @@ static void sc92031_disable_interrupts(s
struct sc92031_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
void __iomem *port_base = priv->port_base;

- tasklet_disable(&priv->tasklet);
+ /* tell the tasklet/interrupt not to enable interrupts */
+ atomic_set(&priv->intr_mask, 0);
+ wmb();

+ /* stop interrupts */
iowrite32(0, port_base + IntrMask);
+ _sc92031_dummy_read(port_base);
mmiowb();

+ /* wait for any concurrent interrupt/tasklet to finish */
synchronize_irq(dev->irq);
+ tasklet_disable(&priv->tasklet);
}

static void sc92031_enable_interrupts(struct net_device *dev)
@@ -363,6 +383,9 @@ static void sc92031_enable_interrupts(st

tasklet_enable(&priv->tasklet);

+ atomic_set(&priv->intr_mask, IntrBits);
+ wmb();
+
iowrite32(IntrBits, port_base + IntrMask);
mmiowb();
}
@@ -608,6 +631,7 @@ static void _sc92031_reset(struct net_de

/* clear old register values */
priv->intr_status = 0;
+ atomic_set(&priv->intr_mask, 0);
priv->rx_config = 0;
priv->tx_config = 0;
priv->mc_flags = 0;
@@ -824,9 +848,9 @@ static void sc92031_tasklet(unsigned lon
struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)data;
struct sc92031_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
void __iomem *port_base = priv->port_base;
- u32 intr_status;
+ u32 intr_status, intr_mask;

- intr_status = xchg(&priv->intr_status, 0);
+ intr_status = priv->intr_status;

spin_lock(&priv->lock);

@@ -851,7 +875,10 @@ static void sc92031_tasklet(unsigned lon
_sc92031_link_tasklet(dev);

out:
- iowrite32(IntrBits, port_base + IntrMask);
+ intr_mask = atomic_read(&priv->intr_mask);
+ rmb();
+
+ iowrite32(intr_mask, port_base + IntrMask);
mmiowb();

spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
@@ -862,29 +889,33 @@ static irqreturn_t sc92031_interrupt(int
struct net_device *dev = dev_id;
struct sc92031_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
void __iomem *port_base = priv->port_base;
- u32 intr_status, old_intr_status, new_intr_status;
+ u32 intr_status, intr_mask;
+
+ /* mask interrupts before clearing IntrStatus */
+ iowrite32(0, port_base + IntrMask);
+ _sc92031_dummy_read(port_base);

intr_status = ioread32(port_base + IntrStatus);
if (unlikely(intr_status == 0xffffffff))
- return IRQ_NONE;
+ return IRQ_NONE; // hardware has gone missing

intr_status &= IntrBits;
if (!intr_status)
- return IRQ_NONE;
-
- do {
- old_intr_status = priv->intr_status;
- new_intr_status = old_intr_status | intr_status;
- } while(unlikely(cmpxchg(&priv->intr_status,
- old_intr_status, new_intr_status)
- != old_intr_status));
-
- iowrite32(0, port_base + IntrMask);
- mmiowb();
+ goto out_none;

+ priv->intr_status = intr_status;
tasklet_schedule(&priv->tasklet);

return IRQ_HANDLED;
+
+out_none:
+ intr_mask = atomic_read(&priv->intr_mask);
+ rmb();
+
+ iowrite32(intr_mask, port_base + IntrMask);
+ mmiowb();
+
+ return IRQ_NONE;
}

static struct net_device_stats *sc92031_get_stats(struct net_device *dev)
@@ -1007,7 +1038,7 @@ static int sc92031_open(struct net_devic

priv->pm_config = 0;

- sc92031_disable_interrupts(dev);
+ /* Interrupts already disabled by sc92031_stop or sc92031_probe */
spin_lock(&priv->lock);

_sc92031_reset(dev);
@@ -1442,6 +1473,9 @@ static int __devinit sc92031_probe(struc
priv->port_base = port_base;
priv->pdev = pdev;
tasklet_init(&priv->tasklet, sc92031_tasklet, (unsigned long)dev);
+ /* Fudge tasklet count so the call to sc92031_enable_interrupts at
+ * sc92031_open will work correctly */
+ tasklet_disable_nosync(&priv->tasklet);

/* PCI PM Wakeup */
iowrite32((~PM_LongWF & ~PM_LWPTN) | PM_Enable, port_base + PMConfig);
@@ -1527,7 +1561,7 @@ static int sc92031_resume(struct pci_dev
if (!netif_running(dev))
goto out;

- sc92031_disable_interrupts(dev);
+ /* Interrupts already disabled by sc92031_suspend */
spin_lock(&priv->lock);

_sc92031_reset(dev);


--
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@xxxxxxxxxx
cesar.barros@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/