Re: Why disable vdso by default with CONFIG_PARAVIRT?

[Zachary Amsden]

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Zachary Amsden wrote:
>   
> > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >     
> > > Hi Andi,
> > >
> > > What problem do they cause together?  There's certainly no problem with
> > > Xen+vdso (in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the
> > > right libc with Xen-friendly TLS).
> > >   
> > >       
> > Methinks the compat VDSO support got broken in the config?  Paravirt +
> > COMPAT_VDSO are incompatible. 
> >     
>
> Yes, that's true, but I'm looking at arch/i386/kernel/sysenter.c:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> unsigned int __read_mostly vdso_enabled = 0;
> #else
> unsigned int __read_mostly vdso_enabled = 1;
> #endif
>
> I can't think of any reason why that should be necessary.
>   

It's not for us or Xen.  Perhaps it came from lhype?  
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/