Re: [patch 2.6.19-git] rtc framework: rtc_wkalrm.enabled reportingupdates

From: Alessandro Zummo
Date: Tue Dec 12 2006 - 19:49:29 EST


On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:49:13 -0800
David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Fix a glitch in the procfs dumping of whether the alarm IRQ is enabled:
> use the traditional name (from drivers/char/rtc.c and many other places)
> of "alarm_IRQ", not "alrm_wakeup" (which didn't even match the efirtc
> code, which originated that reporting API).
>
> Also, update a few of the RTC drivers to stop providing that duplicate
> status, and/or to expose it properly when reporting the alarm state.
> We really don't want every RTC driver doing their own thing here...
>
> Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

--

Best regards,

Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy

http://www.towertech.it

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/