Re: [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing

[Ingo Molnar]

* Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > the other problem is load_balance(): there this_rq is locked and you 
> > call resched_cpu() unconditionally.
> 
> But here resched_cpu() was called after double_rq_unlock().

yeah, you are right - the schedule() one is/was the only problem.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/