Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs

[Eric W. Biederman]

Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> There is still a question of how to handle the NUMA case but...
>>
>
> the numa case is already handled; the needed info for that is exposed already
> enough... at least for irqbalance

What is the problem you are trying to solve?

If it is just interrupts irqbalanced can't help with we can do that
with a single bit.

My basic problem with understanding what this patch is trying to
solve is that I've seen some theoretical cases raised but I don't see
the real world problem.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/