Re: [PATCH] incorrect error handling inside generic_file_direct_write

From: 'Christoph Hellwig'
Date: Fri Dec 15 2006 - 05:44:21 EST


> +ssize_t
> +__generic_file_aio_write(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
> + unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos)

I'd still call this generic_file_aio_write_nolock.

> + loff_t *ppos = &iocb->ki_pos;

I'd rather use iocb->ki_pos directly in the few places ppos is referenced
currently.

> if (ret > 0 && ((file->f_flags & O_SYNC) || IS_SYNC(inode))) {
> - ssize_t err;
> -
> err = sync_page_range_nolock(inode, mapping, pos, ret);
> if (err < 0)
> ret = err;
> }

So we're doing the sync_page_range once in __generic_file_aio_write
with i_mutex held.


> mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> - ret = __generic_file_aio_write_nolock(iocb, iov, nr_segs,
> - &iocb->ki_pos);
> + ret = __generic_file_aio_write(iocb, iov, nr_segs, pos);
> mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>
> if (ret > 0 && ((file->f_flags & O_SYNC) || IS_SYNC(inode))) {

And then another time after it's unlocked, this seems wrong.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/