+ if (len > TASK_SIZE)
+ return -ENOMEM;
Shouldn't that be addr+len instead? The check looks incomplete
otherwise. And you meant ">=" I guess?
No. Have a look at the other hugetlb_get_unmapped_area()
implementations. Because this is in the get_unmapped_area() path,
'addr' is just a hint,
so checking addr+len would give bogus
failures. This test is, I believe, essentially an optimization - if
it fails, we're never going to find a suitable addr, so we might as
well give up now.
- /* Paranoia, caller should have dealt with this */
- BUG_ON((addr + len) > 0x100000000UL);
-
Any real reason to remove the paranoia check? If it's trivially
always satisfied, the compiler will get rid of it for you :-)
Yes - this is the very bug on which was causing crashes - the "caller
should have dealt with this" comment is wrong. The test has been
moved into htlb_check_hinted_area() and now simply fails (and so falls
back to searching for a suitable address), rather than BUG()ing.