Re: error handling in sysfs, fill_read_buffer()

[Oliver Neukum]

Am Dienstag, 2. Januar 2007 16:47 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> 
> > Am Dienstag, 2. Januar 2007 16:26 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > if a driver returns an error in fill_read_buffer(), the buffer will be
> > > > marked as filled. Subsequent reads will return eof. But there is
> > > > no data because of an error, not because it has been read.
> > > > Not marking the buffer filled is the obvious fix.
> > > > 
> > > > 	Regards
> > > > 		Oliver
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > --
> > > > 
> > > > --- a/fs/sysfs/file.c	2006-12-24 05:00:32.000000000 +0100
> > > > +++ b/fs/sysfs/file.c	2007-01-01 15:03:14.000000000 +0100
> > > > @@ -70,7 +70,8 @@
> > > >   *	Allocate @buffer->page, if it hasn't been already, then call the
> > > >   *	kobject's show() method to fill the buffer with this attribute's 
> > > >   *	data. 
> > > > - *	This is called only once, on the file's first read. 
> > > > + *	This is called only once, on the file's first read unless an error
> > > > + *	is returned.
> > > >   */
> > > 
> > > I don't think this matches what people expect of sysfs.  If a show method 
> > > fails then the assumption is that the file cannot be read at all, so 
> > > there's no point in trying to call the method again.
> > 
> > This would make handling ENOMEM very hard.
> 
> No harder than handling any other error: Close the sysfs file, then open 
> it and try to read it again.

If you close it, it doesn't matter. However if not, it does.
Not all the world simply uses "cat".

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/