Re: tty->low_latency + irq context

[Alan]

> with tty->low_latency set, but it doesn't AFAICS. One possibility for
> deadlock is if the tty->buf.lock spinlock is taken on behalf of a user
> process...

The case to watch out for is

	flip_buffer_push -> ldisc -> driver write of echo/^S/^Q

if you call flip_buffer_push while holding your own lock you may get in
a mess on the echo path.
 
>       * data is received, enough to completely fill the tty buffer
>       * tty_flip_buffer_push() schedules flush_to_ldisc()
>       * before flush_to_ldisc() runs, more data is received
>       * flush_to_ldisc() truncates the incoming data (look for
>         tty->receive_room)
> 
> I don't see how this is supposed to work in general.

For non fake tty hardware at real speeds it wasn't a problem under about
1Mbit. Current tty layer code just uses memory buffering based on kmalloc
and has a 64K limit instead. Works better SMP, scales better and we no
longer need to do stunts like the flip buffers to scrape 56Kbit on a
386SX16

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/