Re: revert PIE randomization?

[David Woodhouse]

On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 20:11 +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> And I notice that Andi added a personality & ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE check
> into randomize_stack_top: I cannot see why that's necessary there,
> but if it is, then should the ET_DYN case add it too?)

While I think of it... it seems that ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE isn't "inherited"
across exec of 32-bit binaries on x86_64 or ppc64. The personality flags
get wiped out when we detect a 32-bit ELF executable and set the
personality to PER_LINUX32.

This causes suboptimal behaviour from userspace code which checks
whether it can set ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE with a sys_personality() call, and
if so re-execs itself. Run on x86_64 or ppc64, these go into an endless
loop because it always gets cleared in the exec.

I've seen such code in two places recently (Macaulay2 and sbcl, iirc).

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/