Re: Linux 2.6.16.37

[Chuck Ebbert]

In-Reply-To: <20070104222517.GL20714@xxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:25:17 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> There's already a CVE number for
> "i386: save/restore eflags in context switch".
> 
> Are there also CVE numbers for the equivalent x86_64 patch and
> "x86_64: fix ia32 syscall count"?

Sorry, my Web access is broken for now so I can't check, but I believe
that CVE number is for a different, older problem.

So AFAIK there are no CVE numbers for anything I sent (but there
probably should be.)  Generic Linux kernel developers don't have
a CVE representative, so we depend on vendors to assign numbers
and sometimes they don't.

-- 
"That's the problem with non-representational art:
 you can't tell which part offends you."
     --Stephen Colbert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/