Re: [patch] paravirt: isolate module ops

From: Rusty Russell
Date: Sun Jan 07 2007 - 20:10:55 EST


On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 19:31 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 03:18:45AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > PS. drm_memory.h has a "drm_follow_page": this forces us to uninline
> > various page tables ops. Can this use follow_page() somehow, or do we
> > need an "__follow_page" export for this case?
>
> Not if avoidable. And it seems avoidable as drm really should be using
> vmalloc_to_page. Untested patch below:

Thanks Christoph, that patch looks great to me! I didn't know about
vmalloc_to_page...

Want to produce a signed-off version?

Thanks,
Rusty.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/