Re: [PATCH 01/24] Unionfs: Documentation
From: Josef Sipek
Date: Tue Jan 09 2007 - 05:46:20 EST
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:53:45AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 07:03:35PM -0500, Erez Zadok wrote:
> > However, I must caution that a file system like ecryptfs is very different
> > from Unionfs, the latter being a fan-out file system---and both have very
> > different goals. The common code between the two file systems, at this
> > stage, is not much (and we've already extracted some of it into the "stackfs
> > layer").
>
> I think that's an very important point. We have a chance to get that
> non-fanout filesystems right quite easily - something I wished that would
> have been done before the ecryptfs merge - while getting fan-out stackable
> filesystems is a really hard task.
Hard or harder?
> In addition to that I know exactly
> one fan-out stackable filesystem that is posisbly useful, which is unionfs.
RAIF is another fan-out stackable fs with much more complex logic. (Just the
other day, I saw an announcement for a new version on fsdevel.)
Josef "Jeff" Sipek.
--
Evolution, n.:
A hypothetical process whereby infinitely improbable events occur with
alarming frequency, order arises from chaos, and no one is given credit.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/