Re: [RFC] Stable kvm userspace interface
From: Avi Kivity
Date: Tue Jan 09 2007 - 09:11:42 EST
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Can we please avoid adding a ton of new ioctls? ioctls inevitably
require 64-bit compat code for certain architectures, whereas
sysfs/procfs does not.
I don't see how the procfs or sysfs models fit kvm. wrt compat code,
the current kvm abi (also ioctl based) is 32/64 bit safe without compat
code, and I certainly don't intend to break it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/