Re: [PATCH 45/59] sysctl: C99 convert ctl_tables in drivers/parport/procfs.c

From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Tue Jan 16 2007 - 18:03:42 EST


Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Eric,
>
> On Tuesday, 16. January 2007 17:39, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/parport/procfs.c b/drivers/parport/procfs.c
>> index 2e744a2..5337789 100644
>> --- a/drivers/parport/procfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/parport/procfs.c
>> @@ -263,50 +263,118 @@ struct parport_sysctl_table {
>> + {
>> + .ctl_name = DEV_PARPORT_BASE_ADDR,
>> + .procname = "base-addr",
>> + .data = NULL,
>> + .maxlen = 0,
>> + .mode = 0444,
>> + .proc_handler = &do_hardware_base_addr
>> + },
>
> No need to initialize to zero or NULL. Just list any variable, which is NOT zero
> or NULL.

Agreed. In this case it was left for clarity.

>> + {
>> + .ctl_name = DEV_PARPORT_AUTOPROBE + 1,
>> + .procname = "autoprobe0",
>> + .data = NULL,
>> + .maxlen = 0,
>> + .maxlen = 0444,
>> + .proc_handler = &do_autoprobe
>> + },
>
> Typo here? .mode = 0444 makes mor sense.

Yep looks like it. On my todo.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/