Re: [RFC 5/8] Make writeout during reclaim cpuset aware

From: Paul Jackson
Date: Tue Jan 16 2007 - 23:37:40 EST


> With a per node dirty limit ...

What would this mean?

Lets say we have a simple machine with 4 nodes, cpusets disabled.

Lets say all tasks are allowed to use all nodes, no set_mempolicy
either.

If a task happens to fill up 80% of one node with dirty pages, but
we have no dirty pages yet on other nodes, and we have a dirty ratio
of 40%, then do we throttle that task's writes?

I am surprised you are asking for this, Andi. I would have thought
that on no-cpuset systems, the system wide throttling served your
needs fine. If not, then I can only guess that is because NUMA
mempolicy constraints on allowed nodes are causing the same dirty page
problems as cpuset constrained systems -- is that your concern?

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/