Re: [PATCH: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1] JFS: Avoid deadlock introduced by explicit I/O plugging

[Jens Axboe]

On Wed, Jan 17 2007, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> Jens,
> Can you please take a look at this patch, and if you think it's sane,
> add it to your explicit i/o plugging patchset?  Would it make sense in
> any of these paths to use io_schedule() instead of schedule()?

I'm glad you bring that up, actually. One of the "downsides" of the new
unplugging is that it really requires anyone waiting for IO in a path
like the file system or device driver to use io_schedule() instead of
schedule() to get the blk_replug_current_nested() done to avoid
deadlocks. While it is annoying that it could introduce some deadlocks
until we get things fixed it, I do consider it a correctness fix even in
the generic kernel, as you are really waiting for IO and as such should
use io_schedule() in the first place.

Perhaps I should add a WARN_ON() check for this to catch these bugs
upfront.

> I hadn't looked at your patchset until I discovered that jfs was easy to
> hang in the -mm kernel.  I think jfs may be able to add explicit
> plugging and unplugging in a couple of places, but I'd like to fix the
> hang right away and take my time with any later patches.

Can you try io_schedule() and verify that things just work?

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/