Re: [PATCH] Undo some of the pseudo-security madness

[Samium Gromoff]

At Sat, 20 Jan 2007 17:37:22 +0300,
Samium Gromoff wrote:
[snip]
> So, here we have a buffer-overflow protection technique, which does not
> actually protect against buffer overflows[1], breaking valid applications.
> 
> I suggest getting rid of it.

i botched it slightly:

--- linux/include/linux/personality.h		2007-01-20 17:31:01.000000000 +0300
+++ linux-sane/include/linux/personality.h	2007-01-20 17:32:50.000000000 +0300
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
  * Security-relevant compatibility flags that must be
  * cleared upon setuid or setgid exec:
  */
-#define PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID (READ_IMPLIES_EXEC|ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE)
+#define PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID (READ_IMPLIES_EXEC)

Signed-off-by: Samium Gromoff <_deepfire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/