Re: [PATCH 002 of 4] md: Make 'repair' actually work for raid1.

[Neil Brown]

On Tuesday January 23, akpm@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:26:52 +1100
> NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > +					for (j = 0; j < vcnt ; j++)
> > +						memcpy(page_address(sbio->bi_io_vec[j].bv_page),
> > +						       page_address(pbio->bi_io_vec[j].bv_page),
> > +						       PAGE_SIZE);
> 
> I trust these BIOs are known to only contain suitably-allocated, MD-private
> pages?  Because if these pages can be user pages then this change is
> spectacularly buggy ;)

Your trust is well placed.
This is in the 'resync' path, were all buffers are allocated in lowmem
and are full pages and so-forth, so this is perfectly safe.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/