On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 16:49 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> This is a patch using some of Aubrey's work plugging it in what is IMHO
> the right way. Feel free to improve on it. I have gotten repeatedly
> requests to be able to limit the pagecache. With the revised VM statistics
> this is now actually possile. I'd like to know more about possible uses of
> such a feature.
>
>
>
>
> It may be useful to limit the size of the page cache for various reasons
> such as
>
> 1. Insure that anonymous pages that may contain performance
> critical data is never subject to swap.
This is what we have mlock for, no?
> 2. Insure rapid turnaround of pages in the cache.
This sounds like we either need more fadvise hints and/or understand why
the VM doesn't behave properly.
> 3. Reserve memory for other uses? (Aubrey?)
He wants to make a nommu system act like a mmu system; this will just
never ever work.
Memory fragmentation is a real issue not some gimmickI totally disagree. Memory fragmentations is the issue not only on
thought up by the hardware folks to sell these mmu chips.