Re: [PATCH 0/3] i_ino uniqueness: alternate approach -- hash theinodes

[Jeff Layton]

Eric Dumazet wrote:
> The problem is you wont see the overhead of insert/delete the inode in a
> global tree, since you keep hot caches.
>
> To have a better estimate of the overhead, I suggest you try to use more
> active pipes like :
>

Eric, thanks for the new program. With that, the situation looks slightly
worse:

hashing patch (pipebench):
sys     1m15.329s
sys     1m16.249s
sys     1m17.169s

unpatched (pipebench):
sys     1m9.836s
sys     1m12.541s
sys     1m14.153s

Which works out to 1.05642174294555027017. So ~5-6%.

-- Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/