Re: [PATCH] serial driver PMC MSP71xx, kernel linux-mips.git mast er

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

Marc St-Jean wrote:

> > >>This I would hope you can hide in the platform specific
> > >>serial_in/serial_out functions. If you write the UART_LCR save it in
> > >>serial_out(), if you read IER etc.

> > > I couldn't find hooks for platform specific serial_in/out functions.

> >    It's because there are none. :-)

> > > Do you mean using the up->port.iotype's in serial_in/out from 8250.c?

> >    Not sure what Alan meant, but this seems the only option for now.

> That's the conclusion I came to. I've rewritten the patch to use port.type
> instead of iotype since one of the fix is SoC and not UART specific. I guess

   I failed to folkow your logic. :-)

> I could use both iotype and type with a test on each for the appropriate
> bug, what do you recommend?

   I think iotype would be enough. You can't pass type for platform devices 
anyway, IIRC (the thing I don't quite like).

> >  >>And we might want to add a void * for board specific insanity to the 8250
> > >>structures if we really have to so you can hang your brain damage
> > >>privately off that ?

> > > Sounds good to me, it would give us a location to store the address of the
> > > UART_STATUS_REG required by this UART variant.

> >    I doubt we really need to *store* it somewhere. Isn't it an fixed offset
> > from UART's base (I haven't seen the header)?

> Unfortunately it's not a constant offset from the UART in the SoC register

   Hm...

> space. I've used Alan suggestion and added a classic, on some other OSes %-|,
> void "user" pointer.

   Only do not do it under #ifdef.

> Marc

WBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/