Re: [PATCH 1/2]: Fix BUG in cancel_dirty_pages on XFS

[Nick Piggin]

David Chinner wrote:

> Only if we leave the page in the page cache. If we toss the page,
> the time it takes to do the I/O for the page fault is enough for
> the direct I/o to complete. Sure it's not an absolute guarantee,
> but if you want an absolute guarantee:

So I guess you *could* relax it in theory... Anyway, don't take
my pestering as advocacy for wanting XFS to do something more
clever in such a corner case. I think you're quite right to be
conservative and share codepaths between direct IO read and
write.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/