Re: [PATCH 3/3] lutimesat: actual syscall and wire-up on i386

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Sun Jan 28 2007 - 03:01:13 EST


Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
+asmlinkage long sys_lutimesat(int dfd, char __user *filename, struct timeval __user *utimes)

Could we get these to take struct timespec instead of struct timeval?

Right now we have a real problem in that the interfaces that *set* times take struct timeval (microsecond granularity) but the interfaces that *get* times return struct timespec (nanosecond granularity), which means information loss on any setting operations.

-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/