Re: [PATCH 11/14] atomic_ulong_t

[Christoph Lameter]

On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> provide an unsigned long atomic type.

Is this really necessary? We have no atomic_uint_t type either.

Could you use atomic_long_t instead?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/