Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

[Martin Bligh]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:12:31 +0530
> Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:01:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800
> > > "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this.  I had to
> > > > >   apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 compilation
> > > > >   errors.  And a number of patches were dropped due to no-compile or to
> > > > >   runtime errors.  Heaven knows how many runtime bugs were added.
> > > > dbench seems to panic on xfs / cfq ?
> > > OK, I'll dump git-block.patch.  That means that the fsaio patches get
> > > temporarily dropped as well as they depend on git-block changes somewhat.
> > Would you like me to rework these back again to not depend on git-block ?
>
> Is OK thanks, I now have a git-block minus CFQ changes, so I have restored the fsaio
> patches.

On a happy note - mm2 seems to pass testing much better ;-)

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/