Re: [-mm patch] x86_64 GTOD: offer scalable vgettimeofday II

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > The 'price' paid for it is lower resolution - but it's still good 
> > for those benchmarking TPC-C runs - and /alot/ simpler.
> 
> BTW another comment: I was told that at least one of the big databases 
> wants ms resolution here. So to make your scheme work would require a 
> HZ=1024 regular interrupt. [...]

if resolution is an issue then i can improve this thing to be based off 
a separate /optional/ hrtimer, thus if it's enabled it could enable 1000 
Hz (and not 1024 Hz) update for the variable. The update resolution 
could be tuned via a sysctl trivially, so everyone could tune the 
resolution of this to the value desired, and could do so runtime.

[ It could also be driven by the database right now: from a thread open 
  /dev/rtc, set it to 1024 HZ, and do a gettimeofday() call in every 
  tick - that will auto-update the timestamp. ]

> [...] But that would also make everything slower again due to CPU 
> overhead as it was learned in the 2.4->2.6 HZ transition.

note that this cost was measured on UP and on older hardware, and the 
cost of having a global 1000 Hz update gets linearly cheaper with the 
increase of CPUs on SMP: because only one such update has to be running. 
The systems those database vendors are interested in typically have a 
fair number of CPUs.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/