Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpharelease.

[Bill Davidsen]

Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > I described in details why and how M:N model better, and its drawbacks
> > include all issues mentioned by Ulrich Drepper, but nevertheless its
> > advantages are far too superiour than those which can be
> > provided by 1:1
> > model.
>
> M:N threading is an unnecessary performance hack that's needed by people
> who are living in a C or C++ exile away from some language that has
> lexical closures, generators or first-class continuations.

Yes, that's called the "real world." Arguments of the "I don't need it, 
in a perfect world you wouldn't either, therefore it's a bad idea" type 
simply contribute nothing.

Because user threading can avoid context switches, there will always be 
cases where it will outperform o/s threads for hardware reasons.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/