Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
From: Zach Brown
Date: Mon Feb 05 2007 - 15:22:38 EST
No, that's *really* it ;)
For syscalls, sure.
The kevent work incorporates Uli's desire to have more data per
event. Have you read his OLS stuff? It's been a while since I did
so I've lost the details of why he cares to have more.
Let me say it again, maybe a little louder this time: I'm not
interested in worrying about this aspect of the API until the
scheduler mechanics are more solidified.
- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/