Re: [patch 00/21] Xen-paravirt: Xen guest implementation forparavirt_ops interface

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Zachary Amsden wrote:

> For the most part, it doesn't disturb VMware or KVM.  Xen does need some
> additional functionality in paravirt-ops because they took a different design
> choice - direct page tables instead of shadow page tables.  This is where all
> the requirements for the new Xen paravirt-ops hooks come from.

It still seems to be implemented for Xen and not to support a variety of 
page table methods in paravirt ops.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/