Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.20-ck1

[Rodney Gordon II]

On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 00:15 -0600, Rodney Gordon II wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 13:38 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > mdew . writes:
> > 
> > > On 2/16/07, Con Kolivas <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> This patchset is designed to improve system responsiveness and interactivity.
> > >> It is configurable to any workload but the default -ck patch is aimed at the
> > >> desktop and -cks is available with more emphasis on serverspace.
> > >>
> > >> Apply to 2.6.20
> > > 
> > > any benchmarks for 2.6.20-ck vs 2.6.20?
> > 
> > Would some -ck user on the mailing list like to perform a set of interbench 
> > benchmarks? They're pretty straight forward to do; see:
> > 
> > http://interbench.kolivas.org
> > 
> > --
> > -ck
> 
> Here are some benches comparing 2.6.18-4-686 (Debian sid stock) and
> 2.6.20-ck1-mt1 (2.6.20-ck1 + sched-idleprio-1.11-2.0.patch)
> 
> I know it's not what was asked for, but it might be useful for review of
> anyone using Debian kernels considering ck patches :)
> 
> Take a look.
> 
> -r

System specs by the way:
Pentium-D 830 3.0GHz Dualcore, 1.5GB RAM, 7200RPM 16MB Cache SATA3 using
AHCI w/ NCQ on.

-- 
Rodney "meff" Gordon II -*- meff@xxxxxxxxx
Systems Administrator / Coder Geek -*- Open yourself to OpenSource

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/