Re: Recent and not-so problems with tifm_sd driver

[Pierre Ossman]

Alex Dubov wrote:
> 
> You'll agree, I think, that add_disk in mmc_block_probe issues a lot of requests (reads partition
> table, fs superblocks and such - plenty of room for critical errors). Then, driver's remove method
> will not be called before driver's probe method had finished. So mmc_block is quite involved, even
> though it does not affect the problem's resolution.

I agree that mmc_block's probe method will generate a whole bunch of requests.
But I don't see how that can be called given the scenario you describe.

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  PulseAudio, core developer          http://pulseaudio.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/