Re: [PATCH 2.6.20 1/1] fbdev,mm: hecuba/E-Ink fbdev driver

[Jaya Kumar]

On 2/18/07, Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Given that, this would have to be something that's dealt with at the
> subsystem level rather than in individual drivers, hence the desire to
> see something like this more generically visible.

Hi Peter, Paul, fbdev folk,

Ok. Here's what I'm thinking for abstracting this:

fbdev drivers would setup fb_mmap with their own_mmap as usual. In
own_mmap, they would do what they normally do and setup a vm_ops. They
are free to have their own nopage handler but would set the
page_mkwrite handler to be fbdev_deferred_io_mkwrite().
fbdev_deferred_io_mkwrite would build up the list of touched pages and
pass it to a delayed workqueue which would then mkclean on each page
and then pass a copy of that page list down to a driver's callback
function. The fbdev driver's callback function can then do the actual
IO to the framebuffer or coalesce DMA based on the provided page list.

I would like to add something like the following to struct fb_info:

#ifdef CONFIG_FB_DEFERRED_IO
struct fb_deferred_io *defio;
#endif

to store the mutex (to protect the page list), the touched page list,
and the driver's callback function.

I hope this sounds sufficiently generic to meet everyone's (the two of
us? :) needs.

Thanks,
jaya

ps: I've added James and Geert to the CC list. I would appreciate any
advice on whether this is a suitable approach.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/