Re: [PATCH 3/4] coredump: ELF-FDPIC: enable to omit anonymous shared memory

[David Howells]

Kawai, Hidehiro <hidehiro.kawai.ez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Core dumping is separated two phases, one is the phase of writing
> headers, the other is the phase of writing memory segments.  If the
> coredump_omit_anon_shared setting is changed between these two phases,
> a corrupted core file will be generated because the offsets written
> in headers don't match their bodies.  So we need to use the same
> setting in both phases.

Hmmm...  Okay.

> I think that locking makes codes complex and generates overhead.
> So I wouldn't like to use lock as far as possible.  I think passing
> the flag as an extra argument is the simplest implementation to
> avoid the core file corruption.

Actually, I don't think the locking is that hard or that complex.

	int do_coredump(long signr, int exit_code, struct pt_regs * regs)
	{
		<setup vars>

		down_read(&coredump_settings_sem);

		...

	fail:
		up_read(&coredump_settings_sem);
		return retval;
	}

And:

	static ssize_t proc_coredump_omit_anon_shared_write(struct file *file,
						    const char __user *buf,
						    size_t count,
						    loff_t *ppos)
	{
		<setup vars>

		down_write(&coredump_settings_sem);

		...

	out_no_task:
		up_write(&coredump_settings_sem);
		return ret;
	}

The same could be applied to all controls that change the coredumping
variables, in particular the sysctl for core_pattern could be wrapped so as to
remove one of the reliances on lock_kernel() and the lock_kernel pair could be
removed from do_coredump().

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/