Re: [PATCH 0/7] containers (V7): Generic Process Containers

[Serge E. Hallyn]

Quoting Sam Vilain (sam@xxxxxxxxxx):
> Paul Menage wrote:

> We talked about naming a bit before, see
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/21/403 and possibly other threads.  So,
> anyway, feel free to flog this old dead horse and suggest different
> terms.  We've all had long enough to think about it since so maybe it's

Bah,

Paul, how about s/container/rug/, as in resource usage group?

At least you can be pretty sure that (a) rug won't conflict with any
other computer science therm, and (b) for that exact reason it should be
pretty memorable.

-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/