Re: [PATCH 1/1] LinuxPPS: Pulse per Second support for Linux

[Rodolfo Giometti]

On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 06:56:20PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> It's not a precondition for a file descriptor, either.  There are plenty 
> of ioctl-only device drivers in existence.
> 
> Furthermore, a file descriptor doesn't imply a device entry.  Consider 
> pipe(2), for example.
> 
> As far as the kernel is concerned, a file handle is a nice, uniform 
> system for providing communication between the kernel and user space. 
> It doesn't matter if one can read() or write() on it; it's perfectly 
> normal to support only a subset of the normal operations.

The problem is that sometimes you cannot have a filedescriptor at
all. Think about a PPS source connected with a CPU's GPIO pin. You
have no filedes to use and defining one just for a PPS source or for a
class of PPS sources, I think, is a non sense.

RFC simply doesn't consider the fact that you can have a PPS source
__without__ a filedes connected with, and a single filedes is
considered __always__ connected with a single PPS source.

Ciao,

Rodolfo

-- 

GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail:    giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux Device Driver                             giometti@xxxxxxxxx
Embedded Systems                     		giometti@xxxxxxxx
UNIX programming                     phone:     +39 349 2432127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/